War, Crime and Disease

An Evaluation of the Double Threat of Terrorism

Authors

  • David Pannocchia University of Glasgow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36399/GroundingsUG.9.199

Keywords:

Terrorism, Security, Civil liberties, Counterterrorism, Sederberg, War, Crime, Disease, Liberty

Abstract

Since 9/11 and the declaration of the War on Terror, terrorism has featured prominently in the 21st century security agenda. As a result, a wide range of counterterrorist measures have been developed in order to provide security in states across the globe. Yet their intensification, while ostensibly diminishing one threat, has arguably increased the threat to another: civil liberties. By adopting Sederberg’s typology of counterterrorist measures into war, crime and disease approaches, the following analysis seeks to determine the degree to which they alter the balance between security and liberty. Drawing upon evidence from counterterrorist strategies in the US, UK, EU, France and Norway, this article demonstrates that liberal democracies should refrain from securitising or de-politicising terrorism, as either approach would come at a cost to liberty and security, respectively. Rather, the politicisation of counterterrorism, found particularly within the crime approach, offers the most practicable balancing solution to the ‘double threat’ of terrorism.

References

M. Abrahms, What Terrorists Really Want: Terrorist Motives and Counterterrorist Strategy’, (2008) 32: 4 International Security, 78-105.

N. Baker, ‘National Security Versus Civil Liberties’, (2003) 33:3 Presidential Studies Quarterly, 547-567.

BBC News, Edward Snowden: Leaks that exposed US spy programme (2014) [Online] Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23123964 [Accessed: 21 March, 2015].

BBC News,‘Paris attacks: French MPs back constitutional changes’(2016) [Online] Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35541229 [Accessed: 12 Febuary, 2016].

D. Bigo, ‘To Reassure and Protect, After September 11’, (2002) Social Science Research Council [Online] Available at: http://www.ssrc.org/sept11/essays/bigo.htm [Accessed: 15 March, 2015).

D. Blunket, ‘Counter-Terrorism Powers: Reconciling Security and Liberty in an Open Society: A Discussion Paper’, presented to the Parliament for the Home Department (2004).

T. Bunyan,‘The War on Freedom and Democracy: an Analysis of the Effects on Civil Liberties and Democratic Culture in the EU’, (2002) 13 Statewatch analysis, [Online] Available at http://www.ecln.org/essays/essay-11.pdf [Accessed: 11 March, 2015).

B. Buzan, ‘Will the 'Global War on Terrorism' be the new Cold War?’, (2002) 82:6 International Affairs, 1101-1118.

B. Buzan, O. Waever, and J. Wilde, Security: a New Framework for Analysis, (London: 1998, Lynne Rienner Publishers).

A. Chrisafis and J. Borger, ‘French MPs vote to extend state of emergency after Paris attacks’ The Guardian (2015) [Online] Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/ [Accessed: 6 January, 2016].

CNN, (Transcript of President Bush's address (2001) [Online] Available from: http://edition.cnn.com/2001/US/09/20/gen.bush.transcript/ [Accessed: 18 March, 2015].

D.D. Cole, ‘Security and Freedom -Are the Governments’ Efforts to Deal with Terrorism Violative of Our Freedoms?’ (2003) 29 Canada-United States Law Journal, 339-349.

L. Dearden, ‘Paris terror attack: Francois Hollande vows merciless response to Isis “barbarity”’ Independent (2015) [Online] Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/ [Accessed: 12 January: 2016].

A.L. Fimreite, P. Lango, P. Lægreid, and L.H. Rykkja, ‘After Oslo and Utøya: A Shift in the Balance Between Security and Liberty in Norway?’(2013) 36:10 Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 839-856.

B. Grob-Fitzgibbon, ‘What is Terrorism? Redefining a Phenomenon in Time of War’, (2005) 30:2 Peace & Change, 231-246.

B. Hayes, ‘There is no Balance between Security and Civil Liberties -Just Less of Each’, (2005) 12 ECLN.

P. Heymann, ‘Dealing with Terrorism: An Overview’, International Security, (2001) 26:3, 24-38.

L. Jancinto, ‘Paris Is on Wartime Footing’, Foreign Policy (2016) [Online] Available from: http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/02/09/paris-is-on-wartime-footing [Accessed: 12 February, 2016].

P. Kerr, (2013) ‘Human Security’ in Colins, A. (ed.) Contemporary Security Studies 3rd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

K. Krause and M. C. Williams, ‘From Strategy to Security: Foundations of Critical Security Studies’ in Krause K. and Williams M. C. (eds.), Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases, (London: Routledge, 1997).

B. Lutz and J. Lutz, ‘Terrorism’ in Colins, A. (ed.) Contemporary Security Studies 3rd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).

R. Orange, ‘“Answer hatred with love”: how Norway tried to cope with the horror of Anders Breivik’, The Guardian (2012) [Online] Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/apr/15/ [Accessed: 21 March, 2015].

PATRIOT Act, Pub. L. 107-56. 115 Stat. 272. 26 Oct. 2001. [Online] Available from: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-107hr3162enr/ [Accessed: 18 March, 2015].

R. Paul, ‘Trading Freedom for Security: Drifting toward a Police State’, (2003) 14:1 Mediterranean Quarterly, 6-24.

C. Peoples and Vaughan-Williams, Critical Security Studies: an introduction, (Oxon: Routledge, 2003).

P. Pham, ‘Law, Human Rights, Realism and the 'War on Terror’, (2003) 4 Human Rights & Human Welfare, 91-104.

D. J. Phillips, ’Locational Surveillance: embracing the patterns of our lives’ in Chadwick, A. and Howard P.N. (eds.) Handbook of Internet Politics (London: Taylor & Francis Ltd, 2003).

A. Reeve, ‘Civil Liberties’ in McLean, I. and McMillan, A. (eds.) The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics, 3rd edition, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).

P. Roe, ‘Is Securitization a 'Negative' Concept? Revisiting the normative debate over normal versus extraordinary politics’, (2003) 43 Security Dialogue, 249-266.

P. Rogers, ‘Global Terrorism’ in Cox, M. and Stokes, D. (eds.) US Foreign Policy, 2nd edition, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).

P. Sederberg, ‘Global Terrorism: Problems of Challenge and Response’ in Kegley, C.W. (ed.) The New Global Terrorism: Characteristics, Causes, Controls, Prentice Hall.(2003)

J. Stoltenberg,‘Norway Mission to the UN’(2011) [Online] Available from: http://www.norway-un.org/NorwayandUN/Norwegian_Politics/ [Accessed: 20 March, 2015].

O. Wæver, ‘The EU as a Security Actor: Reflections from a Pessimistic Constructivist on Post Sovereign Security Orders’, in Kelstrup M. and Williams, M.C. (eds.), International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration, (London: Routledge, 2000).

M. Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars, (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980).

B. Wazir, ‘From Charlie Hebdo attacks to a state of emergency’ Al jazeera (2016) [Online] Available at: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2016/01/charlie-hebdo-attacks-state-emergency-160106125210613.html [Accessed: 8 January, 2016].

A. Wolfers,‘“National Security" as an Ambiguous Symbol’, 67. Political Science Quarterly.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-01

Issue

Section

Vol. IX Articles

How to Cite

War, Crime and Disease: An Evaluation of the Double Threat of Terrorism. (2016). Groundings Undergraduate Journal, 9, 72-87. https://doi.org/10.36399/GroundingsUG.9.199