His Father’s Son?

Examining inheritance through the figure of Neoptolemus in Sophocles’ Philoctetes and Vergil’s Aeneid

Authors

  • Sarah Macdonald University of Glasgow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36399/GroundingsUG.9.198

Keywords:

Aeneid, Philoctetes, Sophocles, Virgil, Inheritance, Neoptolemus

Abstract

The play Philoctetes, by Sophocles, and the Aeneid, Vergil’s epic, are parts of the same homeric tradition; responses to ancient poetry afforded practically divine status. This paper is primarily interested in how these authors explore their reception of this tradition through Neoptolemus’ acceptance or rejection of his inheritance; what he may choose to emulate from the person of Achilles, and what they in turn wish to take from the work of Homer. This exploration is particularly concerned with the anxieties of their own times, and a uniting desire to consider conflict and its effect on culture and populace through literary forms. This paper was originally written for the honours course Homer and his readers, taught by Dr Hau and Dr Chadha of the Classics department, and seeks to engage with the same issues of historiography, intent and intertext.

References

Homer, The Iliad, (trans.) Rieu, (New York, 2003).

Vergil, The Aeneid, (trans.) R. Fagles, (New York, 2006).

Sophocles, Electra and Other Plays, (trans.) Raeburn, (New York, 2008).

Strabo, Geography, (trans.) H. L. Jones (Harvard, 1917-1932).

C.R. Beye, Charles Rowan, ‘Sophocles' Philoctetes and the Homeric Embassy’ (1970) 101, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, 63–75.

M. W. Blundell, ‘The 'phusis' of Neoptolemus in Sophocles' 'Philoctetes'’, (1988) 35.2 Greece & Rome, 137–148.

S. Budick, ‘The Prospect of Tradition: Elements of Futurity in a Topos of Homer and Virgil’, (1991) 22:1 New Literary History, 23–37.

D. Fowler, ‘Vergil on Killing Virgins’ in Whitby, Whitby, & Hardie (eds.) Homo viator: classical essays for John Bramble, (Bristol, 1987), 185-198.

J. Gottschall, The Rape of Troy: evolution, violence, and the world of Homer (Cambridge, 2008).

B. M. W. Knox, ‘The Serpent and the Flame: The Imagery of the Second Book of the Aeneid’ (1950) 71:4 The American Journal of Philology, 379–400.

B.M.W. Knox, ‘Philoctetes’ (1964) 3:1 Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics, 42–60.

P. Michelakis, Achilles in Greek Tragedy, (Cambridge, 2002).

L. Muellner, The Anger of Achilles: Mȇnis in Greek Epic, (New York, 1996).

A, Rossi, Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narrative, (Ann Arbour, 2004).

M. Whitby, ‘Telemachus Transformed?’ The Origins of Neoptolemus in Sophocles' Philoctetes’ (1996) 43 Greece & Rome, 31-42.

S. L. Schein, ‘The Iliad and Odyssey in Sophocles' Philoctetes: generic complexity and ethical ambiguity’ (2006) 49 Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Special Issue: Institute of Classical Studies, Bulletin Supplement No. S87:Greek Drama III: Essays in Honour of Kevin Lee,129–140.

Downloads

Published

2016-04-01

Issue

Section

Vol. IX Articles

How to Cite

His Father’s Son? Examining inheritance through the figure of Neoptolemus in Sophocles’ Philoctetes and Vergil’s Aeneid. (2016). Groundings Undergraduate Journal, 9, 61-71. https://doi.org/10.36399/GroundingsUG.9.198