Turgid Bombast or Economic Reason

Two Contrasting Interpretations of the Muse through the work of Mary Wollstonecraft and William Wordsworth

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36399/GroundingsUG.15.125

Keywords:

Mary Wollstonecraft, William Wordsworth, A Vindication of the Rights of Women, Preface to Lyrical Ballads, Muses, Romanticism, Feminism

Abstract

This research paper delves into the contrasting interpretations of the muse by Mary Wollstonecraft and William Wordsworth, as evidenced in their seminal works A Vindication of the Rights of Woman and the Preface to Lyrical Ballads, respectively. The paper critically evaluates how each interpretation shapes contrasting truths about the production and consumption of literature. Wollstonecraft, advocating for reason as her muse, challenges societal norms and seeks to empower women through education. In contrast, Wordsworth embraces feeling as his muse, aiming to directly communicate with the heart of his reader. Through a comparative analysis, this paper explores how these distinct muses inform the authors’ approaches to subjects such as education, uniformity, and gender. Furthermore, it examines the Rousseauvian influences on their views, and how each author’s position of power shapes their narrative. Ultimately, it highlights the radical nature of both texts in the democratisation of poetry and the elevation of the female sex.

References

Abrams. M. H.. 1958. The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition (New York: The Norton Library).

Baldick, Chris. 2015. The Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms (Fourth Edition) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Bushell, Sally. 2020. ‘Wordsworth’s ‘Preface’: A Manifesto for British Romanticism’, in The Cambridge Companion to Lyrical Ballads, ed. by Sally Bushell (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 44 paras.

Butler, Marilyn. 1981. ‘Introduction’, in Romantics, Rebels, and Reactionaries: English Literature and its Background 1760 - 1830, (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1-10.

Gass, William H.. 1984. ‘The Death of the Author’, Salmagundi, 65: 3-26.

McEathron, Scott. 1999. ‘Wordsworth and Coleridge, Lyrical Ballads’, in A Companion to Romanticism, ed. by

Duncan Wu (Oxford: Blackwell), 144-154.

Mellor, Anne K.. 1988. Romanticism and Feminism. ed. by. Anne Mellor (Indiana: Indiana University Press), 3-9.

Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford University Press. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1093/OED/2201700710 [accessed 19 November 2023].

Richardson, Allan. 1988. ‘Romanticism and the Colonisation of the Feminine’, in Romanticism and Feminism. ed. by. Anne Mellor (Indiana: Indiana University Press), 13-25.

Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1762 [1974]. Émile. ed. by P. D. Jimack. trans. by Barbara Foxley (New York: J. M. Dent).

Sottosanti, Karen, Britannica. (2023). https://www.britannica.com/biography/Mary-Wollstonecraft [accessed 07 December 2023].

Tomaselli, Sylvana. 1995 [2012]. Mary Wollstonecraft: A Vindication of the Rights of Men and a Vindication of the Rights of Woman and Hints (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1792 [2004]. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, ed. by Miriam Brody (London: Penguin Books).

Wordsworth, William. 1800 [2012]. ‘Preface to Lyrical Ballads’, in Romanticism: An Anthology, ed. by Duncan Wu (New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell), 506-518.

Wordsworth, William. 1802 [2005]. Lyrical Ballads, ed. by Brett, R. L. et. al. (London: Routledge Classics), 49-303.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-15

Issue

Section

Vol. XV Articles

How to Cite

Turgid Bombast or Economic Reason: Two Contrasting Interpretations of the Muse through the work of Mary Wollstonecraft and William Wordsworth. (2024). Groundings Undergraduate Journal, 15, 204-214. https://doi.org/10.36399/GroundingsUG.15.125