The fatality of scientific monomania
a study of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Christopher Nolan’s The Prestige
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36399/GroundingsUG.11.182Keywords:
Mary Shelley, Christopher Nolan, Frankenstein, The Prestige, Monomania, FatalityAbstract
In this essay I will investigate the various links between scientific development, death, and monomania in an interdisciplinary analysis of Mary Shelley’s 1818 novel Frankenstein and Christopher Nolan’s 2006 film The Prestige. This essay consists of three parts, focusing on the inventor, the invention, and the relationship between science and the arts. The first part of this essay discusses the inventor. It will compare the characters of Victor Frankenstein and Rupert Angier, contrasting and relating their motivations and behaviours in using scientific means to further their careers and reach their objectives. The second component of this essay pertains to the invention itself, primarily by contrasting the characters of Frankenstein’s monster and Rupert Angier’s Prestiges. This section will also discuss how the narrative structures of the film and novel subdue these voices within their respective texts while provoking the reader to formulate their own critical interpretation of the invention’s existence. The third and concluding section of this essay hopes to create further discourse between the scientific discipline and the arts. It evaluates the relationship these artistic texts share with the science which inspires them and argues that they react to the public interest and fears surrounding science rather than aiming to provide an accurate presentation of the scientific subject.
References
Britannica Academic. “Nikola Tesla.” Accessed 12 April 2018. https://academic-eb-com.ezproxy.lib.gla.ac.uk/levels/collegiate/article/Nikola-Tesla/71814.
Brooks, Peter. “What is a Monster? (According to Frankenstein).” In Frankenstein, edited by J. Hunter, 368–90. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2012.
Crowley, Nathan. “Special Feature: Conjuring the Past.” In The Prestige, Christopher Nolan dir.[DVD]. California: Warner Bros, 2006.
Davis, Lennard J. Obsession: A History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
Godwin, William. Caleb Williams. London: Penguin, 1988. As cited by Davis, Lennard J. Obsession: A History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
Hoffman, Jascha. “Science at the Movies.” Nature 455, no. 7214 (2008): 734–5.
Holmes, Richard. “Mary Shelley and the Power of Contemporary Science.” In Frankenstein, edited by J. Hunter, 183–94. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2012.
IMDB. “The Prestige FAQ.” Accessed February 13, 2018. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0482571/faq.
Nolan, Christopher. The Prestige. California: Warner Bros, 2006. Film.
Oates, Joyce Carol. “Frankenstein’s Fallen Angel.” Critical Inquiry 10, no. 3 (1984): 543–554.
Rollin, Bernard E. Science and Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Rose, Christopher. “How to Teach Biology Using the Movie Science of Cloning People, Resurrecting the Dead, and Combining Flies and Humans.” Public Understanding of Science 12, no. 3 (2003): 289–296.
Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Edited by J. Hunter, 2nd edn. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Rachel Smith
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The CC BY 4.0 license is a Creative Commons license. This is a non-copyleft free license that is good for art and entertainment works, and educational works. It is compatible with all versions of the GNU GPL; however, like all CC licenses, it should not be used on software. People are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. But they must conform to the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Please check individual article PDF copies to see if any additional restrictions apply.
