Responsibility to Protect or Licence to Plunder?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36399/GroundingsUG.14.146Keywords:
Responsibility to Protect, R2P, International Relations, Humanitarian Law, International Norms, Conflict, Rules of WarAbstract
Responsibility to Protect (R2P) is a relatively new international norm that permits state intervention in cases of gross humanitarian violations. While R2P was designed to protect civilians from harm, this paper argues that it is an uneven trade-off for deconstructing state sovereignty. By assessing the moral and practical ramifications of R2P, one can find the prioritisation of vague liberal ethics over institutionalised legal frameworks comes at a grave cost to efficient responses to conflict. Subjective interpretations of morality increase the selectivity of the doctrine which is further corrupted by the political, financial, and militaristic concerns of the intervening countries. This paper also explores the internal legitimacy of states and finds that R2P obfuscates a state’s moral duty. R2P provides the West the ability to self-legitimise and control the narrative while failing to address the root causes of conflict. Therefore, it is crucial to explore alternatives to R2P that could better address the challenges of humanitarian intervention.
References
Acharya, A. (2013). The R2P and Norm Diffusion: Towards A Framework of Norm Circulation. Global Responsibility to Protect, 5(4), pp.466–479. doi:10.1163/1875984x-00504006.
Badescu, C.G. and Weiss, T.G. (2010). Misrepresenting R2P and Advancing Norms: An Alternative Spiral? International Studies Perspectives, 11(4), pp.354–374. doi:10.1111/j.1528-3585.2010.00412.x.
Bellamy, A. (2012). R2P - Dead or Alive? In: M. Brosig, ed., The Responsibility to Protect - From Evasive to Reluctant Action? Hanns Seidel Foundation, Institute for Security Studies, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, and South African Institute of International Affairs, pp.11-28.
Bellamy, A.J. (2014). A Trojan Horse? In: The Responsibility to Protect: A Defense. Oxford University Press, pp.112–132.
Bellamy, A.J. (2014). Double Standards? In: The Responsibility to Protect: A Defense. Oxford University Press, pp.133–149.
Buchanan, A. (2018). The Internal Legitimacy of Humanitarian Intervention. In: Institutionalizing the Just War. Oxford University Press, pp.155–185.
CFR. (n.d.). The Rise and Fall of the Responsibility to Protect. [online] Available at: https://world101.cfr.org/how-world-works-and-sometimes-doesnt/building-blocks/rise-and-fall responsibility-protect.
Chandler, D. (2004). The responsibility to protect? Imposing the ‘liberal peace’. International Peacekeeping, 11(1), pp.59–81. doi:10.1080/1353331042000228454.
Chesterman, S. (2011). ‘Leading from Behind’: The Responsibility to Protect, the Obama Doctrine, and Humanitarian Intervention after Libya. Ethics & International Affairs, 25(03), pp.279–285. doi:10.1017/s0892679411000190.
Chimni, B.S. (2021). Justification and Critique: Humanitarianism and Imperialism over Time. In: H. Simon and L. Brock, eds., The Justification of War and International Order: From Past to Present. Oxford University Press, pp.471–487.
Chinkin, C. and Kaldor, M. (2017). The Humanitarian Model for Recourse to Force. In: International Law and New Wars. Cambridge University Press, pp.175–225.
Deller, N. (2011). Challenges and Controversies. In: The Responsibility to Protect. Oxford University Press, pp.62–84.
Eaton, J.G. (2002). The beauty of asymmetry: An examination of the context and practice of asymmetric and unconventional warfare from a Western/Centrist perspective. Defence Studies, 2(1), pp.51–82. doi:10.1080/14702430212331391908.
Eskiduman, Ö. (2022). Gaza: R2P and Selective Implementation. In: P. Gözen Ercan, ed., The Responsibility to Protect Twenty Years On: Rhetoric and Implementation. Palgrave Macmillan, pp.153–169.
Helal, M.S. (2014). Justifying War and the Limits of Humanitarianism. Fordham International Law Journal, 37(3), pp.551–642.
Heuser, B. (2022). War: A Genealogy of Western Ideas and Practices. S.L.: Oxford Univ. Press.
Howorth, J. (2013). Humanitarian intervention and post-conflict reconstruction in the post-Cold War era: a provisional balance-sheet. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 26(2), pp.288–309. doi:10.1080/09557571.2013.790584.
ICISS (2000). The Kosovo Report. Oxford University Press.
ICISS (2001). The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. International Development Research Centre (IDRC).
ICISS (2001). The Responsibility to Protect: Research, Bibliography, Background : Supplementary Volume to the Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
Illingworth, R. (2022). An R2P Commission: A Proposal for Holding States Accountable to Their Responsibility to Protect. Global Studies Quarterly, 2(1). doi:10.1093/isagsq/ksac012.
Jahn, B. (2021). Humanitarian Intervention: Justifying War for a New International Order. In: H. Simon and L. Brock, eds., The Justification of War and International Order: From Past to Present. Oxford University Press, pp.355–375.
Jemirade, D. (2020). Humanitarian intervention (HI) and the responsibility to protect (R2P): the United Nations and international security. African Security Review, 30(1), pp.1–18. doi:10.1080/10246029.2020.1847153.
Kant, I. (1795). Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch.
Kardas, S. (2003). Humanitarian Intervention: A Conceptual Analysis. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 2(3&4), pp.21–49.
Kresic, M. (2021). Is the R2P Norm a Legal Norm? In: New Legal Reality: Challenges and Perspectives. 8th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia. University of Latvia Press, pp.356–368.
Mamdani, M. (2010). Responsibility to Protect or Right to Punish? Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 4(1), pp.53–67. doi:10.1080/17502970903541721.
Tesón, F.R. (2001). The Liberal Case for Humanitarian Intervention. SSRN Electronic Journal, (39). doi:10.2139/ssrn.291661.
Tilly, C. (1985). War Making and State Making as Organized Crime. In: P.B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer and T. Skocpol, eds., Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge University Press, pp.169–191.
United Nations General Assembly. (2005). Resolution 60/1: 2005 World Summit Outcome (16 September 2005). [Online]. A/RES/60/1. [Accessed 27 October 2022]. Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/ A_RES_60_1.pdf
Ziegler, C.E. (2014). Contesting the Responsibility to Protect. International Studies Perspectives, 17(1), pp.75–97. doi:10.1111/insp.12085.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sharath Nambiar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The CC BY 4.0 license is a Creative Commons license. This is a non-copyleft free license that is good for art and entertainment works, and educational works. It is compatible with all versions of the GNU GPL; however, like all CC licenses, it should not be used on software. People are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. But they must conform to the following terms: Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Please check individual article PDF copies to see if any additional restrictions apply.
