Alice and Alisa

Different Aesthetics of Wonderland

Authors

  • Elisa Rigamonti University of Glasgow

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36399/GroundingsUG.15.138

Keywords:

Disney, Kievnauchfilm, Alice in Wonderland, Lewis Carroll, Plasmaticness, Soviet Film, Alisa v Strane chudes

Abstract

This article compares the aesthetics of Wonderland in two animated adaptations of Lewis Carroll’s classic tale, examining Disney’s 1951 rendition and Kievnauchfilm’s 1981 adaptation. Through an analysis of animation techniques, art styles, and cultural influences, it explores how each production visually depicts Alice’s adventures. Disney’s approach is characterized by a grounded, simplified style, while Kievnauchfilm fully embraces the surrealism of Carroll’s text. The essay discusses how Disney’s use of photographic references results in a more realistic portrayal, albeit somewhat lacking the unrestrained nonsense of Carroll’s world, and contrasts it with Kievnauchfilm’s use of multiple art styles to capture Wonderland’s absurdity. It also considers the influence of market demands and religious aesthetics on the American and the Soviet adaptation respectively, and it explores the social and ideological ramifications of Eisenstein’s concept of “plasmaticness” in the animation of both films. Ultimately, this research provides insights into how cultural context shapes the aesthetics of visual storytelling.

References

Blackledge, Olga. “Violence, Chases and the Construction of Bodies in American and Soviet Animated Series.” Animation 5, no. 1 (2010): 41-56. https://doi-org.ezproxy2.lib.gla.ac.uk/10.1177/1746847709356642.

Bye, Susan. “Imagination and invention: ‘Alice in wonderland’ on screen.” Screen Education, no. 92 (2019): 30-37.

Carroll, Lewis. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. Reprint edition. New York: HarperCollins, 2010.

Chaston, Joel D. “The ‘Ozification’ of American Children’s Fantasy Films: The Blue Bird, Alice in Wonderland, and Jumanji.” Children’s Literature Association Quarterly 22, no. 1 (1997): 13-20. https://doi.org/10.1.353/chq.0.1124.

Eisenstein, Sergei. Eisenstein on Disney. Edited by Jay Leyda. London: Methuen, 1988.

Fahmi, Marwa Essam Eldin. “Fantasy Chronotope in Two Animated Children’s Films: Walt Disney’s Alice in Wonderland (1951) and Hayao Miyazaki’s Spirited Away (2001).” Studies in Literature and Language 14, no. 1 (2017): 28-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/9120.

Finch, Christopher. The Art of Walt Disney: from Mickey Mouse to the Magic Kingdoms. Edited by Andrea Danese. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 2004.

Furuhata, Yuriko. “Rethinking Plasticity: The Politics and Production of the Animated Image.” Animation 6, no. 1 (2011): 25-38. https://doi-org.ezproxy2.lib.gla.ac.uk/10.1177/1746847710391226.

Hanada, Kiyoteru. “Cheshire Cat.” Translated by Robin Thompson. Art in Translation 8, no. 1 (2016): 79-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2016.1143710.

Liao, Yanni. “The influence of Russian religious aesthetics on Russian animation.” Visual Studies (2023): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2023.2259350.

MacFadyen, Donald. Yellow crocodiles and blue oranges: Russian animated film since World War Two. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2005.

Ross, Doris. “Escape from wonderland: Disney and the female imagination.” Marvels & Tales 18, no. 1 (2004): 53-66. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41388684.

Geronimi, Clyde, Wilfred Jackson and Hamilton Luske, directors. Alice in Wonderland. RKO Radio Pictures, 1951.

Pruzhanskyy, Yefrem, director. Alice in Wonderland. Kievnauchfilm, 1981.

Sharpsteen, Ben, director. Dumbo. RKO Radio Pictures, 1941.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-15

Issue

Section

Vol. XV Articles

How to Cite

Alice and Alisa: Different Aesthetics of Wonderland. (2024). Groundings Undergraduate Journal, 15, 66-86. https://doi.org/10.36399/GroundingsUG.15.138